By Noah Pitcher( Global politics writer ) - Today News Africa
YouTube recently made the decision to terminate the channel
of prominent Nigerian pastor and televangelist TB Joshua, claiming that his
content repeatedly violated the company’s hate speech policy pertaining to
discrimination based on sexual orientation.
In a statement made Wednesday to Today News Africa, a YouTube
spokesperson Ivy Choi said TB Joshua’s channel, which had amassed over 1.8
million subscribers and 600 million views, repeatedly violated community
guidelines pertaining to hate speech. In particular, she was referring to
videos in which the prominent pastor claimed to cure congregants of their
homosexuality.
“In accordance with our long standing three strikes system,
we terminated the channel The Synagogue Church of All Nations (SCOAN) for
repeatedly violating our hate speech policy. Our Community Guidelines clearly
prohibit content promoting violence or hatred against protected groups based on
attributes such as sexual orientation,” the statement said.
Joshua responded to the labelling of his content as hate
speech, stating, “Our mission is to share the love of God with everyone –
irrespective of race or religion – and we strongly oppose all forms of hate
speech! We have had a long and fruitful relationship with YouTube and believe
this decision was made in haste.”
Many feel that it is a slippery slope to begin policing
people’s actions or beliefs under the ambiguously defined label of “hate
speech.” At what point does rhetoric become hate speech and stop being
protected under the umbrella of religious freedom?
In the video that is most responsible for triggering the
closure of Joshua’s channel, he “casts out the demon of homosexuality” from
congregants.
The video’s description read, “God hates sin, not sinners.
When the Bible says, ‘Do not judge so that you will not be judged’, it means we
should hate sin, not the sinner because sinners can change… We should hate the
act, not the people because our battle is not against flesh and blood but
against the spirit beings that cause all these acts.”
While YouTube is meant to be a platform where creators can
openly share ideas and express themselves, many have taken TB Joshua’s ban as
an affront to the teachings of Christianity and an infringement on free
expression.
Community guidelines are an important aspect of any social
media platform such as YouTube, and representatives of the company have
repeatedly asserted that hate is not welcome on the popular video platform.
Clearly, heinous offenses such as the incitation of violence
or the promotion of child trafficking should have no place on YouTube. Yet, the
label of hate speech can feel loosely defined, all-encompassing, and open to
subjective interpretation. There is much disagreement about the extent to which
offensive content should be tolerated and at what point free speech turns into
hate speech.
Should a preacher be banned for openly practicing his
religious beliefs just because they are offensive or controversial? What is the
line that preachers cannot cross without their rhetoric being labeled hateful
and impermissible? This raises many concerns amongst religious communities
about whether pastors can be punished for merely reading the teachings of
Scripture.
It can be difficult to achieve the right balance between
appropriately monitoring hate speech and simultaneously promoting the free
expression of religious beliefs. For instance, how can YouTube best administer
its community guidelines to make sure that conservative Christians and members
of the LGBT community both feel welcome and respected on the platform?
A platform with 2.3 billion users around the globe, YouTube
is a subsidiary of Google and holds immense power and influence all over the
world. The decision of what type of content should be allowed or banned from
being posted on the platform is incredibly significant and impactful worldwide.
If YouTube were to disproportionately police conservative
content, it would be accused of imposing the company’s ideological perspective
on its users. Therefore, conservative Christians ought to be entitled to the
same freedom of expression as more liberal content creators regardless of
whether or not YouTube agrees with their perspectives.
YouTube spokesperson Ivy Choi asserted that all content
creators are held to the same standard, saying of the decision to terminate TB
Joshua’s channel for hate speech, “We enforce this policy consistently,
regardless of speaker, nationality or religious affiliation.”
There is much controversy and disagreement surrounding the
policies by which YouTube monitors content. If the organization wants to
promote tolerance, it can be difficult to strike the right balance between
respecting religious freedom and simultaneously protecting the interests of
people groups.
While making sure that all users feel welcome on YouTube
regardless of race, religion, or sexual orientation is one of the company’s top
concerns, it is no easy feat to pull off. Protecting the interests of one group
sometimes means taking protections away from another group, leaving YouTube
performing a never-ending balancing act.
There are many practical challenges for a company like
YouTube, which is headquartered in California, United States but has grown to
immense popularity worldwide. This provides for additional difficulties in
monitoring global content, given the religious and cultural differences between
different parts of the world. Throughout Nigeria and much of Africa,
homosexuality is currently punishable by law.
As the world reacts to the removal of TB
Joshua’s channel and many disagree about whether or not it was justified, the
pastor urged listeners Friday to “be strong” and said, “I got to know what
happened to YouTube when I saw the viewers complaining… I want you to help me
pray for YouTube… Don’t see them the other way around; see them as friends.”